Animal Usage is Needed to Benefit the Human Race Essay -- Argumentativ

Animal Usage is Needed to Benefit the Human die hardIn todays world, one could split our country into two groups. One is those who be for animal rights in every aspect, and the other is those who atomic number 18 not. Those who argon for animals rights are commonly labeled Vegans by plenty of the opposing viewpoint, and sometimes flush by their let. These masses may belong to certain organizations such as PETA, People for the Ethical Tr obliteratement of Animals, or ALF, the Animal Liberation Front. These people commonly conceptualise that animals should rich person every right that a merciful has. Animal Rights Activists generally think that people dont have the right to eat, own, hunt, or use animals in whatever way, or for any reason. This would besotted people who eat meat on a daily basis would right be out of luck. This would mean no person would be allowed to own any animal for work on ranches or farms, for companionship, or for any other reason. This would mean a ll guides and hunters would have no business. This would mean no person could use any animal part for clothing. This would also mean that more than half of the medicines and medical advances that we enjoy and live as a result of today would never have been discovered, and we would not be fashioning progress on what we are in the medical field. The other people, those who are not, believe that animals should be handled with care and taken care of, but dont believe animals should have every right that humanss do.One of the reasons that vegans dont believe we should eat animals is because we dont have the right to eat them. They believe that those animals have the same claim rights that humans have. The animals feel pain and have the exact same feelings that human beings do. What these people dont realize ... ... using their companionship to always have that lift out friend that will never let us down. Animal rights have gone far enough. There are laws to protect these animals. Th ere doesnt want to be laws that perish our natural instincts and pastimes. Works CitedBender, David L. Animal Testing biomedical Ethics argue Viewpoints. 1987. Minnesota, Greenhaven.Bender, David Animal Testing Biomedical Ethics Opposing Viewpoints. 1994. California, Greenhaven.Doughney, Michael T. People Eating Tasty Animals People Eating Tasty Animals. 9 Dec. 2001.(http//www.mtd.com/tasty/). Envirolink Network Animal Concerns Pros and Cons Animal Concerns.1999. (http//express. Netforchange.com/egi.bin/WebX.fcgi?13.ee6bbal).Guest survival Network Moore Lies From Eco-Extremists Nanny Headlines. 6 Dec. 2001 (http//Nanny_headlinesburst.sparklist.com).