Are Reason and Emotion Equally Necessary in Justifying Moral Decisions Essay

feeling and discernment are two different right smarts of knowing but can both(prenominal) be used in the same situation. However, does one have a higher weighting than the other when it comes to making moral closes? Using reason to make a knowledge claim or moral decision requires rationality and is justifiable, meaning that everyone would be able to understand the argument for it. Emotion on the other hand is usually only a wild sweet pea feeling or an opinion of an individual and wherefore has no depict or points to support a decision. An example could be when it comes to whether its in good order or harm to murder someone.Its generally accepted that it isnt because, using reason to resign this, everyone should have equal rights and its below the belt for one person to take the life of a nonher. One person whitethorn have the opinion that they do have the right to murder someone else but their argument would not be as strong since it would simply be their opinion of the case. Another example could be homosexuality. Many quite a little who are against it claim that its do by because its not infixed but when thinking of the argument rationally, this would mean cars, airplanes and TVs would also be considered wrong since those things arent natural either.Arguments made using ethics and emotions are not usually consistent and this is why reason is a better way of knowing because it can be applied to many cases. However, sometimes both emotion and reason can be used equally in justifying a moral decision such as when it comes to abortions. According to ethics and emotions, abortion is murder (since the baby is a human being) and murder is wrong (as all lives are valuable and its unjust to take some other ones life).Reason can come in to justify these arguments as well as add the point of the medical complications and set up abortions bring. On the side for the legalisation of abortions, justifiable points includes if the baby has a grievous disease or if the mother does that would be pass down and therefore the baby would lead an unhappy and sick life, if the parents are unfit for the right of parenthood (for example, alcoholics, drug-addicts, teenagers), if the mother was unmarried and lived in a strict eligious society, if it was caused by rape and therefore would be unfair to the women as well as cause psychological harm and the fact that the government is intervening and cut back the freedom of choice for women simply goes against basic civil rights. Emotions are touch in the decision to abort a baby because mothers want whats best for their baby and in most abortion cases, the reason privy it is because they feel their baby would not live the life they deserve.Whether its because theyd spend most of the life in a hospital with an incurable illness or because the mother knows that she wouldnt be good generous for the parenting job. When it comes to making any decisions, whether its a moral one or not, reason s hould be considered more as it uses rationality and therefore is easier to pardon and justify a decision to others. Emotions arent necessarily permanent or consistent and so it would be more difficult to try to retrieve others to understand why youve made a certain decision.